Robots & cobotsCollaborative robots · Industrial robots · Mobile robots
Grippers & toolingGrippers · Vacuum & tool changers
PLCs & controllersPLCs · HMIs & protocols
Sensors & visionSensors · Machine vision
Motion controlServos & steppers · Linear motion
Conveyors & handlingConveyors · Palletizing & feeders
CNC & 3D printingCNC machines · 3D printing & lasers
Safety & planningSafety components · ROI & integration
  1. Home
  2. Buying guides
  3. AMR vs AGV
Robots & cobots

AMR vs AGV: Mobile Robots for Material Handling

Autonomous mobile robots and automated guided vehicles compared: navigation, flexibility, infrastructure, safety, payloads and which suits your facility.

Quick answer

Automated guided vehicles (AGVs) follow fixed paths such as magnetic tape, wires or markers, and suit repetitive routes with heavy loads. Autonomous mobile robots (AMRs) map the facility and navigate around obstacles, so routes can change in software and they work in busier, changing spaces. AGVs are predictable; AMRs are flexible.

Moving material is often the easiest automation win.

Compared

AGV AMR
Navigation Fixed paths Maps, dynamic routing
Obstacles Stops and waits Routes around
Route changes Physical changes Software
Infrastructure Tape, wires or markers Mapping, Wi-Fi, chargers
Best for Repetitive, heavy routes Changing, mixed traffic

Planning

  1. Map current material flows.
  2. Measure loads, distances and trips per hour.
  3. Check floors, doors and lifts.
  4. Plan charging and fleet management.

See cobots vs industrial robots, the automation ROI guide, and belt vs roller conveyor selection. Browse robots and cobots.

Common questions

Do AMRs need infrastructure changes?

Usually little: mapping, Wi-Fi coverage and charging stations.

Are mobile robots safe around people?

They use safety scanners and speed limits; a risk assessment and relevant standards apply to each installation.

Can mobile robots carry heavy loads?

Yes. Both AGVs and AMRs come in models for carts, pallets and heavy loads.